Investigating Algerian University EFL Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions Regarding the Use and Impact of Digital Devices on Speaking Proficiency

Authors

  • Ayad abdoulmunem MINH Department of Letters and the English Language, University of Constantine 1, Algeria
  • Riad BELOUAHEM Department of Letters and the English Language, University of Constantine 1, Algeria

Keywords:

Digital devices, Speaking skills, Technology, Integration, Language learning

Abstract

This study explores the impact of digital devices on speaking skill and their integration into language learning. Findings show that freshmen rely heavily on smartphones, the internet, computers, and tablets for academic purposes. A questionnaire was conducted with 65 first-year English students at Abou EL Kacem Saâdallah, Algiers 2 University, followed by interviews with ten university teachers. The study highlights technology’s crucial role in academic success, enhancing speaking skills, proficiency, and pronunciation. Teachers confirm frequent student use of language learning apps, social media, and video platforms, with smartphones as the primary tool. They acknowledge benefits such as exposure to native speakers and vocabulary-rich content but emphasize student engagement. While digital tools significantly improve speaking skills, their impact on writing and listening is less evident. Both students and teachers recognize technology’s positive influence on language learning, particularly in developing speaking abilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1]. Abdullah, M. (2014). Effectiveness of Audio-Visual Aids in Language Teaching In Tertiary Level. (MA Thesis). Bangladesh: BRAC University.

[2]. Anderson, J. (2010). ICT Transforming Education: A Regional Guide. Bangkok: UNESCO.

[3]. Brown, H. D. (2004). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson

[4]. Bygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford University Press.

[5]. Clark, C. (2004) Notre Dame Tablet PC Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.nd.edu/learning/tabletpc/

[6]. Damian, H. (2019). Setting our vision for Education Technology. In H. Damian, Realising the potential of technology in education: A strategy for education providers and the technology industry (pp. 4-10). England: Department of Education.

[7]. Drouin, M., (2013). “Student Preferences for Online Lecture

Formats.” Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 14(3), 151-162

[8]. Ely, D.P. (1973). Defining the field of educational technology. Audio-visual Instruction, 8(3), 52-53.

[9]. Florez, M. A. C. (1999). Improving Adult English Language Learners' Speaking Skills. ERIC Digest. ERIC.

[10]. Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Pearson Longman.

[11]. Johnson, R. (2020). E-readers as a tool for enhancing learning outcomes in schools. Journal of Digital Learning, 12(3), 45-59

[12]. Nomass, B. B. (2013). The Impact of Using Technology in Teaching English as a Second Language. Academic Journal: English Language and Literature Studies, 3 (1). 111-116.

[13]. Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674.

[14]. Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. Mestre& B. Ross (Ed.).The psychology

of learning and motivation: Cognition in education.pp. 37–76. Oxford:

Academic Press.

[15]. Tinio, V. L. (2002). Survey of ICT Utilization in Philippine Public High Schools.

[16]. Wachsmuth, B. (2003) SHU Tablet PC Project. Retrieved from http://www.cs.shu.edu/tabletpc/

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

English articles

How to Cite

MINH, A. abdoulmunem, & BELOUAHEM, R. (2025). Investigating Algerian University EFL Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions Regarding the Use and Impact of Digital Devices on Speaking Proficiency. Journal of Human Sciences , 36(2), 135-144. http://conferences.umc.edu.dz/h/article/view/4326